unrequited narcissism

Archives: books
Archives: books
July 14, 2006
July 14, 2006
snap books

the harry potter overheard item over on DCist might be one of my favorites. deliciously nasty.

comments [1] trackBack [0] posted by catherine - link
July 05, 2006
July 05, 2006
discuss books

the northern virginia uva book club: saddest book club ever?

bookclubsad.jpg
comments [6] trackBack [0] posted by catherine - link
May 19, 2006
May 19, 2006
cashing in without revenue books  - movies

Everybody is jumping on the Da Vinci Code movie bandwagon — Charles said he could scroll through six pages of Tivo listings tonight before he got a screen without a Dan Brown-related documentary on it. It's disgusting. But also not something I'm above.

So, two things. First, How Things Work has got a tie-in that's worth reading. Apparently Dan Brown was too busy collecting highly suspect Biblical conspiracy theories to actually do any research for the parts of the book set in the present day.

Second, here's my Da Vinci Code review/parody from way back in 2004. Everyone tells me my writing has been a big disappointment since then, so I may as well squeeze one last gasp of relevance out of it.

The Da Vinci Code
Big thumbs down. The only interesting aspect of this book is the conspiracy-theory theology, for which the author can really only claim credit as an editor. I can't say whether any of it is plausible or not — I'll leave that to biblical scholars and that crazy guy at the farmer's market from whom Catherine and I tried to buy goat cheese one time, who wouldn't shut up about Mary Magdalene, the Holy Grail, and the Divine Right of Kings. His cheese was good, but not crazy good.

What I can tell you, though, is that Brown gets a bunch of other stuff wrong, which doesn't bode well for the viability of the biblical mumbo-jumbo. For instance: calling "left brain" thought "irrational"?! Okay Dan, the left/right brain thing is a horrible oversimplification, but if you're going to use it then at least realize that the left hemisphere is credited with language and LOGIC. Also, public key encryption is not the same thing as putting a secret message in a locked container. Sorry. Not even close. In fact, that's not even encryption, dumbass! I can't bear to talk about his magical solar powered hard disk voice recorders.

I'm too upset to continue. Judge for yourself. I've helpfully supplied a lengthy excerpt. Implied spoilers ahead.

"Robert!" Sophie gasped. "I've found something!"

Robert Langdon strode across the old church floor. Resplendent in his tweed jacket, Langdon looked every bit the respected Ivy League academic that his plodding intellect and limited vocabulary belied. With his smolderingly generic white guy good looks, those who wrote about him were frequently prompted to shamelessly compare him to Harrison Ford, although if Mr. Ford's schedule precluded his participation in such a comparison, Michael Douglas would probably also be okay.

"What is it, Sophie?"

"My... My grandfather... He's left us another clue!"

He certainly had. There, on the floor below him, were ten carved letters, which no one through the centuries, except perhaps a few hack thriller writers, had ever noticed.

CKUF HET EPOP

"What does it mean?" breathed Sophie, breathlessly. Sophie's demeanor was unusually flustered. Well, probably unusually. Actually, it wasn't entirely clear what her demeanor was usually like. She was definitely a woman, though, and attractive. Oh yeah! Also she was a cryptologist. It has to do with codes or something.

"Isn't it obvious?" smirked Langdon. His training was coming in handy now. Yes, he thought, symbology is a real academic discipline.

"It's perfect, Sophie. Your grandfather was a genius. He's perfectly summarized the beliefs of the secret society to which he belonged. All in this simple statement.

"You see," he continued, "CKUF seems to be an archaicized variant of cuff — by the way, English is conveniently the de facto language for ancient materials relating to the Grail for some reason. Most likely your grandfather included double velar stop phonemes knowing that Hebrew possessed no C equivalent, and Latin no K. Genius!

"HET is more puzzling — until one considers that the Church has persecuted all ideas associated with the concept of left, or Sinister, due to its association with the sacred feminine! Your grandfather omitted the S as a poignant inside joke — echoing and decrying the Church's shameful legacy! What genius!

"HET then becomes HEST — as in Hester Prynn, of The Scarlet Letter. CUFF HESTER. What better symbol of the Priory of Scion's struggle against religious misogyny than this bold, bumper-sticker-ready summation of the ages-old persecution of the assertion of female sexuality? It's genius!"

"And EPOP?" asked Sophie.

"Most likely a nonsense word, designed to throw off Grail seekers. Your grandfather was obsessed with duality, Sophie, and unlikely to be interested in phrases containing more than two words. He was a genius, Sophie."

"Duality? I don't understand."

With that, Robert embarked on another lengthy discourse into the meaning of ancient symbols, frequently accidentally slipping out of dialogue and into tracts of wild theorizing from an unaccounted-for narrator. None of the words were too big, though, so nobody noticed.

"And that's why," Robert concluded, "Any story involving men and women, opposing forces, or objects that are more round than they are pointy, is a secret code for how Jesus hit that Magdalene shit."

His words echoed through the impressive space of Westminster Abbey, its grand expanses dwarfing the scene below, although if using a location shoot to capture the scene was too expensive it could probably be simulated pretty well with bluescreens.

"I see," said Sophie, staring into Robert's eyes. She was conflicted: in the face of the raw sexual potency of a Harvard academic any woman would have a hard time keeping her lust in check. Yet Sophie sensed that showing her attraction now might hurt her chances with Robert later. Men — and in particular men who were screenwriters — didn't seem to like it when there was any romantic groundwork laid prior to women throwing themselves at bookish hero types upon the conclusion of their adventures. Still, those symbologist eyes...

"Tally Ho!" Their reverie was broken. Sir Leigh Teabing made his way across the church toward them. "As you may recall, I'm dreadfully eccentric and British," Teabing continued, his voice echoing off the walls as if it had been recorded on a soundstage and the reverb added later.

"Leigh," growled Langdon, upset at being interrupted. "Now is not the time. Need I remind you that we're being hunted by an unknown evil mastermind who seems to know our every move? And that in the course of our adventure we have met only three or four characters, half of whom we already know to be bad guys?"

"Righto!" replied Teabing, hurrying off nervously. "Cheers!"

Suddenly, Sophie gasped. "Holy fucking shit, Robert!" she exclaimed. "I think this might be an anagram!"

"Another one?"

There you have it. Seriously, symbology?
comments [8] trackBack [0] posted by tom - link
October 26, 2005
October 26, 2005
just lowbrow enough books

Charles has some interesting news. Interesting if you like comic books, anyway.

comments [0] trackBack [0] posted by tom - link
October 06, 2005
October 06, 2005
apparently it's like a long website, but on paper books

Some light googling for The Turn Of The Screw (prompted by last night's episode of Lost) turned up a pleasant surprise: free ghost story ebooks from Amazon. Yeah, these are all out of copyright and therefore already available via Project Gutenberg. But it's still nice to have it packaged as an ebook — the format almost makes reading on a PDA pleasant.

Oh, and after dragging my uncultured ass through some plot synopses, it seems like the book probably doesn't have many implications for Lost other than a rededication to spooky ambiguity — which we already have plenty of, thanks.

But hell, I'll read it anyway, breaking my longstanding rule of avoiding all literature that isn't directly related to contemporary television shows.

comments [3] trackBack [0] posted by tom - link
September 21, 2005
September 21, 2005
...and hurley is a metaphor for, uh... fat guys? books  - lost

Diane Rehm and her guests just finished having a conversation about The Lord of the Flies — it should be up at that URL soon. No new revelations, of course (wait... it's about society?!?!), but it sure brought back a lot of memories. I love that book — in part because I like my symbolism glaring, thank you very much. But mostly because it reminds me of my first exposure to weeks-long pseudoacademic bullshitting on a single topic. You know, where the teacher signals how hip she is by sitting on a desk. So bohemiam.

And on a related note, allow me to join the governess in expressing excitement over tonight's Lost premiere. My crazy karma machine theory isn't looking too hot based on the plot rumors I've heard. But falling silent just because you're wildly unqualified to speak about something would run contrary to everything I know and love about blogging. So, to that end, Catherine and I have created a new category just for posts about this season of the show.

So: you've had a few months to ponder it. What do you think's in the hatch? My money's on g-g-g-ghosts!

comments [6] trackBack [0] posted by tom - link
August 26, 2005
August 26, 2005
the historian books

i wish i were doing the 50 book challenge, but the way this year is going for me, it's more like the 10 book challenge, and it is sad. but that will not deter me from writing a review of one of the better books i've read so far this year (others beating it out include three junes, saturday, the songs of the kings and, uh, the half-blood prince): the historian by elizabeth kostova. brief review behind the cut (with lots of spoilers, just so ya know). i'll say right now that it's a perfect vacation book; don't be deterred by its heft. it's fairly quick and fun reading.

MORE...
comments [0] trackBack [0] posted by catherine - link
  Powered by Movable Type 3.2
 

Warning: include(../analytics.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/metamon/public_html/zunta/blog/archives/books/index.php on line 867

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '../analytics.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/metamon/public_html/zunta/blog/archives/books/index.php on line 867