bleg

posted by catherine / February 23, 2006 /

i'm looking for people in chicago or illinois who have used match.com, eharmony.com, etc, for an article i'm writing. (really.) it's about a bill going to the senate about online dating safety regulations. if you know anyone, shoot me an email!

UPDATE: how morally dubious would it be for me to create and post a profile, then interview anyone who contacts me in the next few hours?

Comments

Morally dubious? Meh. Just post on craigslist asking for the same info.

Posted by: tweedledopey on February 23, 2006 12:19 PM

i did that, and no one is getting back to me! aren't they dying to be famous in an article that may or may not get picked up by a small illinoise newspaper?

Posted by: catherine on February 23, 2006 12:20 PM

Why bother handing over your hard-earned cash to some new-media guy when you can just sit in a bar and wait for the napkin corners with phone numbers pile up on your table?

Posted by: the subject on February 23, 2006 01:41 PM

craigslist came through! i got some very nice and actually articulate person, whose identity i was able to confirm, to comment. then my post got flagged and deleted. oh well. hurrah internet.

Posted by: catherine on February 23, 2006 01:55 PM

1. I think posting a profile just so you can interview someone violates the User Policy.
2. You're assuming someone's going to contact you immediately upon posting a free profile. It can sometimes take weeks to get someone interested.
3. Free profiles don't allow you to communicate to each other... you have to pay for that.
4. I would be bummed out if I clicked on someones profile and she started talking to me just so she could further her career. Am I right, guys?

Posted by: Tomas on February 23, 2006 02:06 PM

yeah, i don't really know how the dating sites work...i doubt posting a profile would have been successful, anyways. you're right - i probably wouldn't have been contacted till well after deadline.

Posted by: catherine on February 23, 2006 02:07 PM

Wacky - what's the point of that bill - if a site isn't blaring "we checkout our subscribers", isn't it safe to assume that they don't?

Posted by: ptm on February 23, 2006 02:42 PM

yeah, it seems like kind of silly legislation. sites wouldn't be REQUIRED to perform background checks, just tell their users whether they do or not. i suppose it could be a small step towards legislation trying to get such sites to perform background checks all the time.

Posted by: catherine on February 23, 2006 03:25 PM

are you looking for someone in chicago. because if not, i will admit that i've been there and done that....match.com, friendster.com, myspace.com. i could sit for an interview and pose as a chicago-in.

Posted by: Naomi on February 23, 2006 04:07 PM

heh, i don't think that's, how do you say, journalistically ethical, but thanks!

Posted by: catherine on February 23, 2006 04:08 PM

I doubt free sites will do background checks. It will just make online dating more expensive.

Posted by: Teresa on February 24, 2006 08:53 AM

the legislation would actually only apply to sites that charged a fee. and also, it won't require them to do background checks - just to state whether or not they do.

Posted by: catherine on February 24, 2006 08:59 AM

Post A Comment

Name


Email Address


URL


Comments


Remember info?



Google Analytics