...but they're way more endearing. From today's Express:
Someone has to keep Catherine updated on important Butterstick-related developments.
If you can't see the image, click here.
HOLY CRAP SO AWESOME
Explain to me how the woman holding Butterstick can seem so nonchalant? If it were me holding up the cute little furry bastard, I would hard pressed not to try to cuddle and coo at him, and would no doubt be wearing a stupid, happy expression on my face. But this lady, she's like eh, baby panda. Seen one, seen 'em all.
The high contrast in that shot really makes him look like a muppet. Butterstick Fonzie?
I do appreciate the non-broken picture, but how come you don't just post the image that works?
'cause this one that runs on port 8090 doesn't cost us any bandwidth (it's run through the coral cache system -- www.coralcdn.org)
You're right, though: I should just stop cheaping out. We've switched hosts, we can afford a few JPEGs.
That image almost looks photoshopped, it's the same way in the paper edition too. Like a baby in a panda costume. Probably the strangely human-looking face.
I'm assuming Michael meant Fozzie and not Fonzie.