faux currant
It's a lazy Sunday morning, and we're watching Al Gore's Current TV venture. And it's not as bad as everyone's been saying. Since flipping it on we've seen an unnarrated collection of film shot in Gaza over the past week or so; an extremely affecting piece on Darfur from Doctors Without Borders; and a really interesting 1981 CBS News segment on the rise of the personal computer that featured some awesome CGA graphics and a very young Steve Jobs. All three were excellent pieces of content. And all three were immediately followed by some idiot in a Puka shell necklace robotically reading from a teleprompter. I suppose it's to his credit that he didn't even try to pull off the inevitable transition from pondering tragedy to namechecking internet youth culture. What can you do besides push through?
I get that the network needs some kind of framing device, but it isn't these folks -- they make the whole enterprise ring false. These VJs, or MCs, or Pod-people, or whatever they're called, are all culled from the same pool of rich-but-accomplished, attractive-but-not-vain, smart-but-not-interesting, and 100% earnest young people whose defining characteristic is that they're no fun to talk to at parties.
So Al, buddy: allow me to join the chorus of people offering suggestions while doomsaying. Put on some ugly but impeccably qualified people. Don't let the lightweights near issues that involve people getting killed. Cut to a tasteful commercial after every non-superficial segment. Better music wouldn't hurt, either. Remember the NPR rule: political earnestness is inversely related to a person's ability to select music that isn't godawful.
Really, it's not a bad start. But when a news operation's most credible presenter is a guy who shares half his genome with Deepak Chopra, it wouldn't hurt to keep tweaking.
UPDATE: Made two minor embarassment-reducing but content-neutral edits.

Comments
There are two Pod people I find the most excruciating to watch.
http://current.tv/hosts/lugavere.html
http://current.tv/hosts/brecher.html
I don't want to be mean, but producers, and I think they'd both probably be good producers, should stay behind the scenes. Hosts, well, should be good at hosting.
I wrote about the first day of Current here:
http://jscottbarnard.blogspot.com/2005/08/agtv.html
I'd like to say it's improved since then, but just the other day, during band practice, I directed someone's attention to the story about pre-fab housing and how cool I thought the house was. That story was aired on Day 1 and they're still airing it.
I'll tell you what's more current than Current. Washington Journal on C-Span. Phone calls, young guests who are writers/editors, scanning headlines for discussion. And LinkTV, like Current based in San Francisco, is much more informative than Current. Wasn't Current's original mission to be educational/political?
Current is right about how participative its productions can be, I'll give them that.
I don't think I've once seen a live shot. The continuity problems with their hosts are annoying. It may be 10:00am on the west coast and one of the hosts will introduce a segment from an obviously pre-recorded after-dusk shoot. Are they so afraid of their young talent screwing up that they won't go live?
Post A Comment