bandwidth woes

posted by tom / February 25, 2005 /

Just a quick note: we got a message from our hosting company a few days ago indicating that we're on pace to exceed our bandwidth cap for this month. Increasing traffic, the new design and a decision to post more photos all played into this. D'oh. Well, the plan is to move to a new host sometime next week. Things should get speedier -- our current host is located somewhere in southeast Asia -- and we should get about twice the bandwidth allocation for about the same money.

But the site will probably briefly go kerflooey. I'll post more notes about this immediately before it happens, but thought I might as well mention it now. As opposed to, you know, doing actual work toward remedying the situation.

Comments

I got a similar note recently—early in the month I was told that I had exceeded 100% of my available bandwidth memory, which sounded to me like volume-kilograms. Anyway, I figured I would then plaster every square inch of my site with ads, put up a call for $80,000, and then take the month off, but then the bill came and it was like 4 bucks. Still! I should probably do something official like switch hosts, too.

Posted by: Kriston on February 25, 2005 12:58 PM

About your new site design, could you explain something to me? Mozilla is all fun and good, but I frequent a number of computers around campus over which I do not have administrator privledges and am thus forced to use IE. So could you tell me what it is about your site that makes it so clunky to non-mozilla browsers? And I don't want to hear any mumbo-jumbo about data caching or whatever... what sort of aesthetic benefit does your site now have that it didn't before? Is it that snow-covered tree? I mean, I'm no code warrior, but I think I could rig up a website with a picture of a tree that works in IE and mozilla at the same time.

Posted by: jeff on February 25, 2005 01:38 PM

hey tommy, do you think having a site on your RSS reader means it hits that server up for more pages all the time, or does it only download pages when you choose to view them. If it only downloads the index I imagine that is pretty small but depending on how frequently it checks it might become appreciable.

Posted by: Charlton Heston's Penis (long) on February 25, 2005 01:46 PM

Jeff: it's primarily 1) the transparent tiling GIFs and 2) and the large graphic in the sidebar (which is a continuous background from one box to the next -- no one seems to notice it though). I should do something about the sidebar bg graphic. That might improve things, but I'm lazy. Other people have complained about the site, too (Catherine among them). I tend to get hostile in response, but I really do want things to be usable. I'll look into it. You might want to try the "dialup" option at the bottom of the sidebar when you're on IE.

The design is intended to be flexible, but so far I haven't found a good substitute for the tree. I'll get on that, though. Certainly with spring rolling around it's got to be changed.

Jon: RSS readers just look up an individual file repeatedly (index.rdf, in our case). They don't load the whole page. The size of the file varies depending on what's in it, but at the moment it's only 12kb, so I don't think RSS use it's what's pushed us over the edge. Our 5GB limit was relatively low by most hosts' standards, and this is the first time we've received a notice (which just told us we had hit 80% usage, about 75% of the way through february).

It's a problem we're happy to have. Besides, we were going to need more storage space for photos soon, anyway.

Posted by: tom on February 25, 2005 01:52 PM

Dear Tom,

Your page is completely unbearable to view (even in dialup mode) in internet explorer. Though I encourage your efforts to drive everyone away from IE, it's damn annoying. On the matter of the background or side graphic, I think you should steal from the wizznutzz and put up that picture of Kwame Brown as Jesus. It is perhaps the greatest thing I have ever seen.

Posted by: brian on February 25, 2005 06:25 PM

Post A Comment

Name


Email Address


URL


Comments


Remember info?



Google Analytics