security mom goes apeshit, suggests concentration camps as valid part of war on terror
you have to see it to believe it:
from eeeevvverbody's favorite security mom, michelle malkin.
this book is a great addition to malkin's recent column on townhall, where she complains about a UNITY conference where minority journalists argue they aren't receiving fair treatment in the business of journalism. malkin rightly takes these whiners to task for asking for this silly thing called "diversity." what is this "diversity" that they chatter on about? then she complains that she wasn't invited back to the next UNITY conference, which really doesn't seem to make sense, since she hates minorities who ask for equality and wants to put all muslims in an internment camp and you think that UNITY would really want to talk about these issues. in the column she also includes a great "media diversity checklist" that she suggest you pass out to your favorite colored reporter to make sure they are on the right side of the line. it includes questions such as "i oppose bilingual education", "i oppose gay marriage", and "i cry when i hear 'proud to be an american' by lee greenwood." it's true -- that song always does get me right here, in the gut.
only will journalists (and, we presume, the rest of america) be truly diverse when we all become an army of self-loathing, condom-fearing, sappy song-endorsing, gun-toting malkin bots! preferably with bullet-spraying nipples.
i know i shouldn't sputter self-indignant hatred of crazed, racist conservatives before i've fully finished my cup of instant coffee. but i couldn't help it. this woman drives me insane.
Comments
I can't believe her editor allowed that title.
Who, exactly, would she intern? ...and why?
There's a huge difference in racial profiling (no matter where you come down on the issue) and the act of internment itself. They're two separate issues. While racial profiling in and of itself may be morally abhorent, it's what you do AFTER you profile someone that might lead to internment.
One could check out all white males at a concert or stop motorists driving while black to check for drugs. That's profiling. For better or worse. While their subsequent internment may have been initiated by racial profiling, the act of internment itself is only on the basis of a violation.
Would she intern folks for their race alone? We're already interning middleeasterners on the basis of immigration violations. How would she expand on that?
This troubles me...that in this day and age a book, if I were to judge it by the cover, like this can be published with a straight face. It looks like something you'd find on an aryan nation website. It's sickening. --s
JSB: Apparently, according to Dave Neiwert at Orcinus, she's going to attempt a little historical revisionism about the efficacy of Japanese internment camps in order to show that we used to be super-tough on terror without all that PC crap. An interesting, albeit completely wrong, thesis.
all the same, I still definately would.
laser smoking stop laser smoking stop cancer effects lung cancer lung research hypnosis smoking stop against tobacco adenocarcinoma cancer lung stop tobacco adenocarcinoma cancer lung cancer lung treatment cancer lung photo cancer chemotherapy lung herb smoking stop free no sign smoking cancer cell lung small smoking stop wellbutrin cigar no cancer lung symptom free no sign smoking benefit smoking stop
Post A Comment