August 2, 2004 Archives

the incredible hulk takes the GRE

[]
posted by catherine / August 02, 2004 / 3 comments /

respond to this argument:

The University of Claria is generally considered one of the best universities in the world because of its instructors' reputation, which is based primarily on the extensive research and publishing record of certain faculty members. In addition, several faculty members are internationally renowned as leaders in their fields. For example, many of the faculty from the English department are regularly invited to teach at universities in other countries. Furthermore, two recent graduates of the physics department have gone on to become candidates for the Nobel Prize in Physics. And 75 percent of the students are able to find employment after graduating. Therefore, because of the reputation of its faculty, the University of Claria should be the obvious choice for anyone seeking a quality education.

the sample response that received a score of 1:

Is true that University of Claria is generally consider one of the best university in world. Because instructors reputations. Because research and publishing record. Because teach in other countries. Because win Nobel prizes. Because find empolyment after graduating. But other school good just as Claria. Can be little money. Can be good teachers too.

grumblings about the GRE verbal section, part deux

[]
posted by catherine / August 02, 2004 / 5 comments /

i find it so totally depressing that where i go to grad school can, in part, be determined by if i know that a "die" is a "tool used for shaping."

i got worst

[]
posted by catherine / August 02, 2004 / 6 comments /

i've been doing some studying for the GRE this weekend and was feeling increasingly worse about my likely score. then, i read this sample GRE essay responding to a question about if we need more specialists or generalists in society today:

I disagree with the statement about specialists, we need specialists who take individual areas and specialize. A generalists can pinpoint a problem. He or she cannot determine the magnitude of the problem. A specialist can find the root of the problem. When he or she has years working in that specific field. For example, when i got sick i went to a doctor. He did blood work, x-ray, talk to me, ect. He prescribed me a medicine. I got worst. So i decided to go another doctor. Now, i am doing great. A specialist knows the facts right away. Otherwise, it will take longer or not at all.

this essay, not surprisingly, was scored a 1 (out of 6). but it makes me feel so good to read it. if there are barely literate people taking the GRE out there, then i'm not going to be the absolute worst!

Google Analytics