April 13, 2004 Archives

bottoms up, panties down!

[]
posted by catherine / April 13, 2004 / 5 comments /

yikes. this washington monthly article about a new book, pledged: the secret life of sororities (btw, why does every non-fiction book title have to have essentially two titles, the short catchy eye-grabber, then the unnecessarily long post-colon explanation?) is kind of a downer:

Mothers, don't let your babies grow up to be pledges. Sorority pledges, that is. Because if you do--according to Alexandra Robbins's often startling study of college sororities--your daughters may soon be piercing their private parts, guzzling grain alcohol until they pass out, and pimping the sexual favors of their sorority sisters. And that's not all. They may be vomiting after every meal to be as slender as their sisters. They may be taking recreational drugs and suffering date rape more frequently than most college students.

If this sounds less refined than the perky, pearl-draped image of college sororities depicted in the last Reese Witherspoon movie, it surely is. And these examples only scratch the surface of a disturbing subculture ruled by out-of-control peer pressure and the lust for prestige. Consider the rampant eating disorders that Robbins reports from one campus, where a plumber was kept busy clearing the pipes that were continually clogged with the vomit of whole housefuls of bulimic sorority sisters determined to eat heartily and still fit into their size 2 jeans.

Robbins's book, both fascinating and eye-opening, tells us a great deal about well-to-do young women in America, and about the pressures on them. It describes a world in which some sorority houses choose their new members on the basis of hair color, and where a young college woman's chief worry is securing her date for the next formal dance. And these are the less worrisome parts of the whole. No matter how many news stories you may have read about hazing incidents, binge drinking, and "Greek" rituals, the details that Robbins reports are often worse. She writes, for example, about the "little sister" programs that some fraternities continue to sponsor, despite their being forbidden on many campuses. The supposedly prestigious and sought-after position of little sister, Robbins writes, includes "sex with many of the (fraternity) brothers, with gang rape a distinct possibility."

damn. that is some sensational stuff. so it doesn't surprise me to find that the author, who went undercover at a nameless sorority at a nameless university in order to do research, is also a contributing writer at cosmopolitan magazine. ie, home of monthly headlines such as "i almost died at the gas station--how you can protect yourself while filling up," "a man raped me in a well-lit aisle at the grocery store--why searching for the perfect melon can turn deadly," and "you're definitely going to die of cancer." you know, fun stuff that girls like to read.

i went to the university of virginia, where something like, oh, a billion students were in either fraternities or sororities. i never rushed, never wanted to, and normally stayed far away from the sorority scene, though i did partake of frat parties quite a bit, and had some sorority friends.

i definitely made fun of the sororities my fair share, especially during the rush period, when you would see herds--literally, 30 or 40--of girls, clad in black peacoats and black asspants, walking their way up to rugby road to be judged on hair color, body size and family wealth. no doubt about it--the majority of sororities at uva were judgemental, shallow, and came up with terrible slogans for their bid night t-shirts ("Queen For a Day, Crowned for Life", or "If we didn't get you, we didn't want you."). i won't make any bones about it: i hold no love for the greek system.

but, i find it hard to believe the culture that pledged reports on is 100% accurate. i don't think the author lied; however, i'm willing to believe that she chose to selectively report the events that happened. like, i don't know about this whole underworld sexual pimping sorority that she mentions, or the constant bulimia. obviously, some terrible stuff has gone down at fraternity hazings, and sororities have no doubt had an equal share. i just think that this book is probably aiming to become part of the whole culture that terrifies women into consumerism . and that kind of stuff needs to stop.

mothers, don't freak out: i'm fairly sure that if your daughter joins a sorority, she won't become a bulimic, genitila-piercing whore. she might drink some beer, might do some drugs, might have sex she regrets, and will probably succumb to peer pressure on more than one matter. but i really don't think it's as bad as pledged makes it out to be. of course, i was never in a sorority. so it might all be true.

slanted and enchanted

[]
posted by catherine / April 13, 2004 / 1 comment /

proving jay-z goes with everything from ketchup to weezer:

the slack album.

jay-z with pavement.

radio radio

[]
posted by tom / April 13, 2004 / 5 comments /

Have I mentioned I love my XBox? I got the previously-broken media player functionality working today (very high tech: had to change a single letter from 'E' to 'F' in a text file). So now I can stream shoutcast radio stations through the stereo. It's great, except for finding the stations -- SomaFM isn't working for some reason, WVUM (the one that was playing the Ghostbusters' theme in Miami) doesn't netcast, and the college radio station I'm listening to now from the presets -- WIUS -- has shifted from playing solid, accessible music I haven't heard to a roundtable of jackasses from Indiana University discussing how bad the cops are about parking tickets and how lame people in fraternities are. God bless em for trying, but they're not very good. I'm sure I'll be back when they start playing music again, but I can't take much more of their wacky morning crew.

So can anyone suggest some other good internet radiostations that stream in shoutcast format? That'd be anything but windows or real -- it's usually labelled as an mp3 stream. I'm really hoping for quirky college stations staffed by kids cooler than me, but I'll take commercial operations from hippie enclaves as well. Not a huge KEXP fan, though. Immediate disqualification for having any shows dedicated to the Grateful Dead.

sexsexsexy

[]
posted by catherine / April 13, 2004 / 5 comments /

so, i was thinking about this on sunday night after i caught a few minutes of the misery that was the nick and jessica variety of crap hour. i have never seen anything so unfunny in my life, and while nick lachey was alright up on stage bopping around during his musical numbers, i don't think i've ever seen a more terrible live performer than jessica simpson. her face contorted in all sorts of painful ways, she stood bow-legged the entire time, and her lips were rubbery and massive and terrifying.

it boggled the mind. well, my simple mind, anyway. here is a woman who, by all accounts and facts, is gorgeous, has an incredible body, cleavage that could launch a thousand ships, and is lusted after by millions of men. presumably.

then why in the world don't i find her to be even the littlest bit sexy? i mean, i know i'm a heterosexual female and all, but there are certain women who everyone just has to admit are earth-shattering in their sex appeal. however, when i look at jessica simpson, i just get a sense of staring at a life-sized kewpie doll with an nuclearly enhanced bust. she's wholely unthreatening and completely cold-fishy and just...blah. no sex buzz. i feel like if you're going to be some sort of sex symbol, your audience needs to believe in the possibility that you like sex so much that you are just going to jump off that magazine page and ravish everyone in a 50-foot radius. also needed, obviously: wit and intelligence and vivacity, all lacking in ms. simspon.

this is a feeling i get also from paris hilton and--dare i say it--beyonce knowles. paris hilton is self-explanatory (has anyone seen that recent men's mag cover she was on, wearing little and pursing her lips and looking like a drug-addled kitten?), but i have never, not even once, found beyonce to be the littlest bit sexy. i do like her music, and her voice is very nice and she can wail and dress sexy and writhe with the best of them--the elements are there--but offstage she's just too clean and wholesome. and every time she's acting sexy onstage, i feel like it's a completely calculated sexiness, not spontaneous or real in any way, only designed to achieve maximum marketability.

tommy said britney spears is someone who's in control of a legitimate sexuality and sex appeal, and i agree. but jessica simpson, paris hilton and beyonce knowles are just one big unsexy BLAH.

Google Analytics