edwards?

[]
posted by catherine / February 24, 2004 /

this is why, in part, i didn't vote for edwards in the primary:

It bothers and worries me to see how enamored you have become of John Edwards’ candidacy. I live in North Carolina, and having witnessed his rapid rise to national prominence I feel I should hold up a sign that says, “Warning, Turn Back NOW!” Edwards does have skill and charisma, but his primary skill is the ability to convince a jury (and an electorate) that he has substance. There is no evidence that he knows how to govern. He has never done it, at any level.

And remember, Edwards has also never been re-elected to any political office, has never been reaffirmed at the polls by those he represents. There are plenty of Carolinians who are convinced he decided to run for President only because he would be unlikely to be re-elected as Senator based on his performance in office so far. He began running for President less than half way through his first term in Washington, and consequently has done nothing for his constituents, unless one considers his actual constituency to be the trial lawyers lobby and those few who had the opportunity to give him 35% of the proceeds of their litigation.

For all the concern about other politicians’ ties to ‘special interests’, here we have a candidate who is financed by and is running for the trial lawyers, the richest and most entrenched special interest of all. It boggles the mind to realize that someone with no experience in government, no demonstrated understanding of international relations and no meaningful record in domestic affairs is being touted so highly for the most important job in the world, simply because he is a pretty face with the backing of serious money. And because he is not Kerry, Dean, or a Republican.

Comments

trial lawyers are the richest and most entrenched special interest? what about the military/industrial complex? big pharma? the oil industry?

still, I don't like Edwards either. I get a very strong used car salesman vibe from him.

Posted by: tom on February 24, 2004 02:15 PM

yeah that part was kind of whatever. but i agree with the rest.

Posted by: catherine on February 24, 2004 02:36 PM

Post A Comment

Name


Email Address


URL


Comments


Remember info?



Google Analytics