girls

[]
posted by catherine / February 19, 2004 /

so far the theories that have been advanced:

intelligent women = more attractive than stupid women
brunettes = more attractive than blondes
public school girls = more attractive than private school girls

i agree with #s 1 and 3, and generally, i assume women of all hair-color are equally attractive, though i do think redheads are especially beautiful.

and in the interest of ego, i will propose:

taller girls = more attractive than short girls
blogging girls = more attractive than non-blogging girls
liberal arts girls = more attractive than e-school girls (but overall, poorer)
which might go against a theory that
rich girls = more attractive than poor girls
(and i have to add a disclaimer that i have many short, non-blogging friends that are very beautiful. so i guess they're the exception to the rule. or whatever.)

this could get more and more specific and go on forever (girls who wear gap jeans = more attractive than girls who wear levis) so i'll stop.

just read, also: "Diotima, Dan Moore and Tyler Cowen all point to a study showing that when they are particularly fertile, women are likely to rate other women as less attractive. Nature concludes that this says something about the use of cattiness as a competitive tactic. Maybe."

yay for cattiness! but i don't understand why it would matter what other women thought of other women's attractiveness when they were trying to get pregnant. unless it gives them a super-boost of ego and confidence and they can just strut their stuff all over the place and get their man. or something along those lines.

Comments

I agree with your last point there. It's not like women are competing for scarce resources when they are trying to find a man that will sleep with them.

Maybe cattiness is not a biological condition, but an evolutionary response to those slutty little outfits *some* girls seem to think they can get away with.

Posted by: susan on February 19, 2004 01:48 PM

those evil bitches. don't they know their back fat is showing?

Posted by: catherine on February 19, 2004 03:24 PM

Oh, I don't know. These days, sure, guys are all over the place. Increase the infant mortality rate and likelihood of sabre-tooth-tiger-attack; decrease settlement size and life expectancy. Suddenly the pool of genetically desirable males has shrunk quite a bit. In that context I could see "she's a total skank" quickly turning into "I just crushed her windpipe".

Posted by: tom on February 19, 2004 04:11 PM

I like the girls with big cans and trucks that go BOOM

Posted by: jon on February 20, 2004 11:09 AM

Post A Comment

Name


Email Address


URL


Comments


Remember info?



Google Analytics