simpsons movie coming in 2006.
good thing or bad, TBD.

not to make light of the death of the two-headed baby girl, but really, there's no way you can't post a picture like this.

completely unrelatedly to two-headed babies... numerous pundits have started weighing in on the kerry electability phenomenon. (though kaus has been at tearing kerry down for a long time already.) i did vote for kerry, because i think he's a good candidate and i think he has good experience. not because i think he's the only one who can beat bush. if i voted that way, i think i would have gone with edwards, but he doesn't have enough experience for me to want him running the country. anyway, the only thing i can say re: pundits predicting this and that about kerry: stop predicting, assholes! you're about as good as local weathermen.

and so utterly pretentious: i can't stand statements like this:
"Kerry is clearly benefiting from the fact that people think other people are going to vote for him down the road, which is why they're voting for him now; they're not voting for him because he's the candidate they personally want to be president."

i'm sorry, mssr scheiber -- when the hell did you receive the ability to discern why tens of thousands of people voted the way they did? i have never read anything so arrogant in my life. yes, a lot of exit polls may suggest electability is A reason many people voted for kerry, but not necessarily THE ONLY reason. and perhaps some even voted for him solely because they agree with him on key issues and believe he can do a half-way decent job running the country!

damn hell ass pundits. they make me mad. the only thing they're good for is dissecting why something went wrong after the fact.

paris hilton and her future, untanned self?

will fathead larry sabato haunt me all my life?